| “重划疆界”与“厚描”——新历史主义文学批评关键词 |
| “Boundaries Redrawing” and “Thick Description”——Keywords in New Historicism Criticism |
| 投稿时间：2013-04-25 |
| 中文关键词:新历史主义 重划疆界 厚描 历史 文本 |
| 英文关键词:new historicism boundaries redrawing thick description history text |
| 基金项目: |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 1589 |
| 全文下载次数: 2440 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 格林布拉特曾指出，文学和文学研究的疆界从来不是固定不变的，划界和重新划界乃是文学研究的特点。作为当代多元文化产物的新历史主义，其文学批评即肇始于对历史和文学的重划疆界，它打破了历史与文学、文学文本与其他非文学文本之间的固定界线。在批评实践中，新历史主义吸纳了人类学中“厚描”的方法，注重多种文本的“互文互动”，这是其新型历史观和文本观的必然结果。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| Stephen Greenblatt has pointed out that the boundaries established in literature and literary studies are never fixed, and mapping and remapping characterizes the field of literary criticism. As a product in the multi cultural background, New Historicism came into being with remapping the fields of history and literature. It has breached the fixed boundaries between history and literature, between literary texts and non literary texts. In its critical practices, New Historicism absorbs the method of “thick description” from anthropology and pays much attention to the interactions between various texts which is the necessary measure in accordance with its new opinions on history and literature. |
| 郑 思 明.“重划疆界”与“厚描”——新历史主义文学批评关键词[J].石家庄铁道大学学报(社会科学版),2013(4):39-43. |
| 查看全文 下载PDF阅读器 |
|
| 关闭 |